JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 15, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Martinez Pablo Emilio·Respondent Ministerio De Salud

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Nulidad Por Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la acción de tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Ministerio de Salud, Fondo Pasivo Prestacional del Sector Salud y la Fundación San Juan de Dios, a partir del auto proferido por el Juzgado Octavo Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, toda vez que aplicó lo dispuesto en el Art. 1 del Decreto 1382 de 12 de julio de 2000 que, como ya se dijo, no resulta aplicable por ser contrario a la Carta Política.

En consecuencia, se ordenó remitir el expediente al citado juzgado para que realice el trámite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Pablo Emilio Martinez, contra el Ministerio de Salud, Fondo Pasivo Prestacional del Sector Salud y la Fundacion San Juan de Dios, a partir del auto de veintiocho (28) de noviembre de 2000, proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Bogota, visible a folio 8 del expediente.
  3. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente por Secretaria al Juez
  4. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Bogota, para que, de manera inmediata se le imprima a esta accion de tutela el tramite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.